跳转到内容
成林

让每个个体更加健康

The Startup Dilemma I -- IP Conflicts

Startup Dilemma Series 1, the basic principle to handle IP conflicts. The key word is to remain fair when handling difficult situations.

How to resolve the concern that the startup employee or founders might not get their IP protected and they might be fired from the company without their IP?

There are several steps that a startup can take to protect the intellectual property (IP) of its employees and founders, and to ensure that they are fairly compensated for their contributions. These steps include:

  1. Have employees and founders sign IP assignment agreements: Startups can have their employees and founders sign IP assignment agreements that specify that any IP created by the employee or founder while working for the startup belongs to the startup. This can help to prevent disputes over ownership of IP in the future.

  2. Offer equity or other forms of compensation: Startups can offer equity or other forms of compensation, such as bonuses or profit sharing, to employees and founders in exchange for their IP contributions. This can help to ensure that they are fairly compensated for their contributions and that they have a stake in the success of the startup.

  3. Establish clear policies and procedures: Startups can establish clear policies and procedures for the creation, ownership, and use of IP. This can help to ensure that employees and founders understand their rights and responsibilities with respect to IP, and can help to prevent misunderstandings or disputes.

  4. Use non-disclosure agreements: Startups can use non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to protect confidential information and IP, and to prevent employees and founders from disclosing or using the IP without permission.

By taking these steps, startups can help to protect the IP of their employees and founders, and can help to ensure that they are fairly compensated for their contributions.

What would happen to the startup that has failed, but the IPs of the startup are still valuable? Can the inventor of these IPs still benefit from them?

If a startup has failed but the intellectual property (IP) that it created is still valuable, the inventor of the IP may still be able to benefit from it. This could occur in a number of ways, depending on the specific circumstances of the case.

One possibility is that the inventor could sell or license the IP to another company or individual. For example, if the inventor holds a patent on a valuable technology, they could sell or license the patent to another company that is interested in using the technology.

Another possibility is that the inventor could start a new company to exploit the IP. For example, if the inventor holds a patent on a product that has a high market demand, they could start a new company to manufacture and sell the product.

Finally, the inventor could try to negotiate with the failed startup to see if they are willing to transfer ownership of the IP to the inventor. This could be a difficult process, as the failed startup may have different interests or obligations with respect to the IP.

Overall, it is important for inventors to carefully consider their options and to seek legal advice if they are in a situation where they have valuable IP but their startup has failed. There may be opportunities to benefit from the IP even if the startup has failed, but it is important to approach these situations with caution.

Could inventor of the IP legally sell or license the patent to another company while the current company owns the IP?

It is generally not possible for an inventor to sell or license a patent to another company while the current company owns the patent. This is because the current company has the legal right to control the use of the patent, including the right to sell or license the patent to others.

However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. One possibility is that the inventor could negotiate with the current company to transfer ownership of the patent to the inventor. This could involve the inventor paying the current company for the patent or entering into a licensing agreement with the company.

Another possibility is that the inventor could challenge the current company’s ownership of the patent. For example, the inventor could argue that they were not properly compensated for their contribution to the patent, or that the current company is not using the patent in a way that is consistent with the inventor’s intentions. If the inventor can successfully challenge the current company’s ownership of the patent, they may be able to sell or license the patent to another company.

Overall, it is important for inventors to be aware of their rights with respect to their IP, and to seek legal advice if they are in a situation where they believe they may have grounds to challenge the current ownership of a patent.


发布于
分类: Self Reflection

上一篇 - Self Reflection Risk Management, Insurance, and the Chinese Red Tradition 下一篇 - Self Reflection “付费就是捡便宜”的成立条件
通过 RSS 订阅
EN